{"id":2228,"date":"2015-10-08T00:00:05","date_gmt":"2015-10-08T05:00:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/chriscutrone.platypus1917.org\/?p=2228"},"modified":"2021-11-18T13:57:10","modified_gmt":"2021-11-18T18:57:10","slug":"art-and-freedom","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/chriscutrone.platypus1917.org\/?p=2228","title":{"rendered":"Art and freedom"},"content":{"rendered":"

Chris Cutrone<\/h2>\n

Letter in <\/em>Weekly Worker<\/strong> 1077<\/a> (October 8, 2015).\u00a0<\/em>[PDF]<\/a><\/p>\n

Entire exchange with Rex Dunn on art and Marxism available as compiled PDF<\/a>.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Rex Dunn poses \u201cteleology\u201d against \u201caccident\u201d in support of \u201cessentialism\u201d (“Obfuscations”, Letters, October 1<\/a>). But this neglects that, according to Hegel, Geist<\/em>, as the \u201cself-moving substance [essence] that is subject\u201d, is the expression of the unfolding and development of freedom<\/em>. Art is certainly geistig<\/em> activity, but is not itself Geist<\/em>. Hegel\u2019s telos<\/em> is not posed as a future<\/em>, but rather in the present<\/em>: the present as a necessary and not accidental result of history.<\/p>\n

The telos<\/em> is not the future in the present, but what Hegel called \u201cthe eternally present in the past\u201d. We cannot judge humanity according to an as yet unrealised potential ought<\/em> – what could and should be – but rather we are tasked to find the actuality in what is<\/em>. Not where is the present headed, but how does it point beyond itself? This means that what appears as humanity\u2019s \u201cessence\u201d is an expression of necessity<\/em> in the present – the necessity of<\/em> the present. We should not assume that such necessity will not change, for that would prematurely foreclose possibilities we cannot see now. We are not serving the future, but are failing the present – and the past.<\/p>\n

Schiller wrote of the \u201cplay drive\u201d that unites freedom and necessity, in Homo ludens<\/em>. But even Schiller didn\u2019t think that art should replace all other human activity. Play may express freedom, but it is not itself freedom. Beauty is the symbol, not the realisation, of freedom. Our goal is not a beautiful society, but a free one.<\/p>\n

Marx and Adorno, following him, dismissed the idea that work was to become play. Rather, from \u201clife\u2019s prime need\u201d it was to become \u201clife\u2019s prime want\u201d: that we will work because we want to do so, out of a sense of social and individual duty, and not capitalist compulsion. Our task is not to realise human play, but rather to actualise freedom. According to Adorno, art, like everything else in capitalism, expresses necessity – the necessity of freedom. But it is not itself freedom. Nor will it become that as some final end. Freedom is not the end of necessity in play, but the transformation of necessity – giving rise to new necessities. Freedom is not a state of being, but a process of becoming. More specifically, it is the movement<\/em> of that process. Human \u201cessence\u201d is not art, but freedom<\/em>. There is no reason to believe it will ever end – without an end to humanity. We do not know freedom\u2019s end, but only its need, its next necessary step. Art in capitalism points to that, the next stage of history, not its end.<\/p>\n

As Adorno put it, in the last line of the concluding chapter of Aesthetic Theory<\/em>, on \u2018Society\u2019, \u201c…what would art be, as the writing of history, if it shook off the memory of accumulated suffering?\u201d The history of art, as that of Geist<\/em>, expresses the history of freedom. We suffer not from lack of play, but from the task of freedom. | \u00a7<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Chris Cutrone Letter in Weekly Worker 1077 (October 8, 2015).\u00a0[PDF] Entire exchange with Rex Dunn on art and Marxism available as compiled PDF. Rex Dunn poses \u201cteleology\u201d against \u201caccident\u201d in support of \u201cessentialism\u201d (“Obfuscations”, Letters, October 1). But this neglects that, according to Hegel, Geist, as the \u201cself-moving substance [essence] that is subject\u201d, is the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[37,18,27,32,16],"class_list":["post-2228","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-essays","tag-37","tag-adorno","tag-art","tag-cpgb","tag-marxism"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/chriscutrone.platypus1917.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2228","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/chriscutrone.platypus1917.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/chriscutrone.platypus1917.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chriscutrone.platypus1917.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chriscutrone.platypus1917.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2228"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/chriscutrone.platypus1917.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2228\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3164,"href":"https:\/\/chriscutrone.platypus1917.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2228\/revisions\/3164"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/chriscutrone.platypus1917.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2228"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chriscutrone.platypus1917.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2228"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chriscutrone.platypus1917.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2228"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}